France’s debt crisis: Last stop before technocracy – With drastic cuts and AI transformation, the deliberate chaos is intended to force a new order.

German source article: Frankreichs Schuldenkrise: „Letzte Haltestelle vor dem Felsen“ – Mit einem Kahlschlag soll die Katastrophe verhindert werden – WELT

I did not highlight the wording from the introductory quote from the article for nothing: “Musk-style austerity measures,” in other words: accelerated transformation toward technocratic governance. You can find out exactly what this entails in my books “Das globale Technat” (only available in german for now) and its sequel, “What is technocracy? About the most important term of our time”.

So fortunately, I can keep this brief.

It goes without saying that the debt crisis is the expected result of the fiat money system. It was perfectly clear—not just for years, but for decades—that this form of credit economy could not continue indefinitely. Especially since the central banks, in a concerted action—see the Fed and the ECB—did not accidentally open the floodgates wide after the equally artificially triggered financial crisis of 2008. This led – unsurprisingly – to the oft-lamented astronomical levels of private and public debt. When central bankers cut key interest rates to zero and shout to the people, „Come on, grab it! There’s free money now! For nothing, so to speak!“ – it’s really no surprise – any first-semester psychology student understands this – that a lot of people immediately swallowed this bait – and it was bait – and rejoice at the „free“ conditions or the „money for nothing“. So they grabbed it en masse. Without thinking about the future and the fact that such a monetary policy cannot continue forever. Now we are faced with the (foreseeable) consequences.

So much for the background in a nutshell. In any case, this crisis is now being exploited to make the new digital or electronic panopticon, which has been planned for decades and introduced step by step in recent years in an increasingly accelerated (technocratic-accelerationist manner), palatable to the masses.

This is precisely one of the main reasons for the punitive tariffs imposed by the technocratic Trojan horse Donald Trump: this is not for a second about an “economic war” between nations – that is just the official line that is being drummed into the people in order to mislead them via the gatekeeping and brainwashing press. In short, it is pure disinformation – but rather the targeted destabilization and “volatility” of the old, “classic,” “analog” global economy.

There are two main reasons for this: First, it is part of the long-planned (since at least the 1970s) “deconstruction” of the economy, i.e., deindustrialization (“limits to growth,” Club of Rome, etc.), Joe Biden’s “Build Back Better” and Dr. Schwabuse’s “Great Reset” from the WEF. Second, it is of course pure coincidence that the „mainstream” mass lobotomedia (aka matrix media) wants to program people parallel to this deliberate volatilization with constant new reports about “Bitcoin highs.” In other words, if you want to transition people to a purely digital monetary and economic system, screw up the „analog“ one.

From a methodological and mass psychological point of view, however, it would be very clumsy and unwise to proceed too radically. In concrete terms, this means that the “analog” economy will of course be allowed to continue running for the time being so that not too many people take notice and start asking critical questions – but it will be discredited – for example with “punitive tariffs,” as mentioned before – to portray it as unsafe and too risky. This will lead many people to believe that it might be better to invest in the new digital currencies (“cryptos”) because they promise much higher returns and are currently experiencing “breathtaking highs” on the trading floor, such as the already hijacked Bitcoin. In one word: bait.

Donald Trump’s “nationalist-populist” politics are the deliberate antithesis to globalism as a thesis. The synthesis will be drawn from the conflict between the two: transition to a totalitarian-techno-fascist, dystopian panopticon.

Hopefully, I won’t have to mention that AI-based solutions will be used to “increase efficiency” in order to establish this technocratic system.